• Welcome back Guest!

    MARSH is a private reefing group. Comments and suggestions are encouraged, but please keep them positive and constructive. Negative threads, posts, or attacks will be removed from view and reviewed by the staff. Continually disruptive, argumentative, or flagrant rule breakers may be suspended or banned.

Help me identify these fish we caught in Galveston (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas, United States
I took my son to collect peppermint shrimp this weekend. We caught a few, though not as many as i would have liked. However, while on the Jetties, we caught these other small fish that are almost like saltwater suckerfish, though the sucker is in the body, not the head. Im attaching some pictures. They are all only an inch or two long. Can anyone help me identify them and let me know if they are safe for my tank (reef only or FOWLR)?
482ec0cd-ffde-458e.jpg
482ec0cd-ffe4-a927.jpg


Also while on the jetties, from the surf area, we caught a fish that looks alot like a large damsel. The one we have is about 4“x4“. A picture is posted of it as well. Can anyone identify it and let me know if it is safe for my FOWLR tank?
482ec0cd-0010-0c6a.jpg




Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 

trb

Guest
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
3
Location
NW Houston
The sucker fish are skillet fish. We've had a couple of them in our tank for up to 6 months, but we kept them in our sump tank. They will eat chunks of shrimp and fish. Don't know about the other fish, but it is not a sargent major damsel, which we also have from Galveston last year.
 
OP
OP
J
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas, United States
Thanks for the info on the skilletfish. Does anyone know if they are reef safe?

I also did a little more research and found out that the black and white fish is an Atlantic spadefish.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
1,985
Reaction score
4
Location
Pearland
I also did a little more research and found out that the black and white fish is an Atlantic spadefish.

Wow, that there is a big fish! I dont know how big your tank is but from the size in the pictures I saw doesnt look like it would last long in a normal (less than 100 gallons) tank.
 

alexrex20

Guest
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
423
Reaction score
0
Location
Spring 77388
ya, that's an Atlantic spadefish that can reach 3ft and 15lbs. I don't recommend it for a fish tank. They're voracious predators and obviously too large for pretty much all home aquaria.
 

below radar

Guest
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
1,554
Reaction score
0
Location
Huffman?
Nice pair of uh...boats...yeah boats
Pretty cool looking fish
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
J
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas, United States
I agree on the spadefish. He is in a 90 gallon tank now and probably a little big for that tank. He may go in the 160 I am setting up for a bit, but he is likely going to be returned to the ocean at my next opportunity.

It is going to be tough to convince my 7 year old to let him go, but it must be done.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 

soymilk

Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
2,611
Reaction score
1,348
Location
Fresno, Texas
I agree on the spadefish. He is in a 90 gallon tank now and probably a little big for that tank. He may go in the 160 I am setting up for a bit, but he is likely going to be returned to the ocean at my next opportunity.

It is going to be tough to convince my 7 year old to let him go, but it must be done.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

From an environmental point of view, the fish should be destroyed and not put back into the water if it has been in contact with any other creatures from different parts of the world. kinda sucks but yea...
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
1,985
Reaction score
4
Location
Pearland
From an environmental point of view, the fish should be destroyed and not put back into the water if it has been in contact with any other creatures from different parts of the world. kinda sucks but yea...

I have always wondered about this. There are many aquariums around the world that return their animals to the ocean even if they arent in natural sea water and have shared space with other animals not from their area of the ocean. Is their any way to limit the possibility of cross contamination?
 

dayton

Guest
Joined
Jan 3, 2012
Messages
559
Reaction score
0
Location
Katy
I thought MARSH was about conservation? Not taking animals that have miles and miles to roam so that we can put them in our 100 gallon tanks? Interesting
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Location
Copperfield
I thought MARSH was about conservation? Not taking animals that have miles and miles to roam so that we can put them in our 100 gallon tanks? Interesting

trollololololol

You speak as if the animals you purchase and put in your tank were born and raised in tanks... (I know there are some, but not many)
 

alexrex20

Guest
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
423
Reaction score
0
Location
Spring 77388
I thought MARSH was about conservation? Not taking animals that have miles and miles to roam so that we can put them in our 100 gallon tanks? Interesting

actually MARSH is about exactly the opposite. what about the aquarium hobby has anything to do with conservation?
 

alexrex20

Guest
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
423
Reaction score
0
Location
Spring 77388
From an environmental point of view, the fish should be destroyed and not put back into the water if it has been in contact with any other creatures from different parts of the world. kinda sucks but yea...

you're right. and we should also destroy any person that tries to return to Houston once they travel out of the area. :rolleyes:
 
Top