soymilk
Supporting Member
wait til you ask him about calcium reactors vs dosing
A friend in Sweden runs the state aquarium in Stockholm, he defined expert as someone who has made every possible error in a field of endevor. However I prefer this quote in his sigature.There must be a million ways to be an unsuccessful reefer and lots of ways to achieve your goals as a successful reefer. Seems to me that “success” is an individual benchmark though. To some, using the latest gear, testing and methods this means chasing elements and focusing on making sure SPS in particular has more than enough ambient elemental support to grow and develop at maximum speed. To others, testing, fancy gear and modern methods don’t mean much as long as base principles of nature are followed. very different approach, very different results. Both Successful in their own, very different, ways.
When you show me sponges, flame scallops and sea apples in captivity, I might consider “your way”.
While you may use ICP to test inorganic nutrients, you have no idea of the diversity of bacteria in your systems.
Your assumptions that you are to viewed as an expert is far from realty. You are persistent.Lol, I’m not trying to convince you to adopt “my way.”
Let me know when you want to compare Chemistry. You can try to convince me that weak chemistry is better for a reef, but I know better.
I test “inorganic” nutrients at my home. I think you’re confused. ICP detects atoms like phosphorus, regardless of chemical form. It can come from organic forms (Such as DNA, Phospholipids, etc...), but also inorganic phosphate.
Also, chemistry wins the day when it comes to Biome. An established system with better chemistry will always have a stronger Biome and Bacterial Diversity if everything else is the same.
BTW….your appeal to age (52 yrs of reefing) is a fallacy which is “commonly cited” across every message-board.
Your age or experience isn’t “evidence” for your position, and it definitely doesn’t make it superior. Good try though!
I’ve know many older reefers who still can’t grow coral, and I’ve seen reefers come in for 3 years and grow massive colonies.
You know what they say… “If their tank ain’t nice…don’t take their advice.”
So now it’s only fair to post tank pics to compare yours to Subsea’sLol, I’m not trying to convince you to adopt “my way.”
Let me know when you want to compare Chemistry. You can try to convince me that weak chemistry is better for a reef, but I know better.
I test “inorganic” nutrients at my home. I think you’re confused. ICP detects atoms like phosphorus, regardless of chemical form. It can come from organic forms (Such as DNA, Phospholipids, etc...), but also inorganic phosphate.
Also, chemistry wins the day when it comes to Biome. An established system with better chemistry will always have a stronger Biome and Bacterial Diversity if everything else is the same.
BTW….your appeal to age (52 yrs of reefing) is a fallacy which is “commonly cited” across every message-board.
Your age or experience isn’t “evidence” for your position, and it definitely doesn’t make it superior. Good try though!
I’ve know many older reefers who still can’t grow coral, and I’ve seen reefers come in for 3 years and grow massive colonies.
You know what they say… “If their tank ain’t nice…don’t take their advice.”
No doubt there are many successful ways to operate a marine aquarium. When I moved into my first home, I incorporated 150G in house display tank with 1500G extended refugiums and shallow frag tanks In my garage.There must be a million ways to be an unsuccessful reefer and lots of ways to achieve your goals as a successful reefer. Seems to me that “success” is an individual benchmark though. To some, using the latest gear, testing and methods this means chasing elements and focusing on making sure SPS in particular has more than enough ambient elemental support to grow and develop at maximum speed. To others, testing, fancy gear and modern methods don’t mean much as long as base principles of nature are followed. very different approach, very different results. Both Successful in their own, very different, ways.
I never read all of the research paper but my friend Timfish read all of it and he took me to school. I did watch the 20 minute video on coral nutrition which is for advanced hobbiest and presented in a very pragmatic way.
One of the surprises reading de Goeij's paper on elemental cycling is sponges remove DOC in 30 minutes that takes the bacterioplankton 20 days, or about 1000X faster (pg 50). Seems to me a lot of the success attributed to skimmers should in reality be attributed to sponges.
This is Jasper de Geoij's ground breaking research on reef sponges. (The introduction is in Dutch but the content is in English.)
Buddy, are you advocating the use of undergravel filters?The concept of reverse flow undergravel filter came from Old School cichlid fish keepers.
https://s7d2.scene7.com/is/image/PetSmart/5174813?$CLEARjpg$
Above is a standard ug plate with two uplift tubes powered by air pump. With that arrangement, water is drawn down into sandbed. Reverse the flow, with a pump into plenum and up thru sandbed. This helps to prevent clogging sandbed with ditritous.
I used eggcrate light diffuser with fiberglass window screen mesh on top of eggcrate. Use 1/2” PVC on its side to create void space of plenum. When sizing eggcrate, leave 1” from edge of glass to allow screen to be tucked in. This same 1” gap allows pump discharge plumbing to be run to center of plenum. The gap also hides eggcrate and nylon mesh so you only view substrate. Cover everything with 1”- 2” of aroggonite substrate.
yes to reverse flow thru undergravel substrate of aroggonite. It’s worked for me for 25 years. It’s the same tank in build thread.Buddy, are you advocating the use of undergravel filters?
Did you take your water to the local fish shop to be tested?