Cody
Vice President
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Content Moderator
Board Member
Supporting Member
When you compare the pros and cons of t5s to leds, a few aspects come to mind immediately. How much PAR are they putting out? What kind of spectrum? How much coverage? There seems to be some common answers to these types of questions that everyone just "knows" and accepts. For example, which has better coverage? Probably going to be t5s. But I just had a light bulb turn on (figuratively speaking) in my head about spectrum. Why is it just understood that t5s have a fuller spectrum? Myself included has used them as supplementation to leds for quite a while, and that was one of the two main reasons. I'm not sure why it never clicked before, but the spectographs tell a different story. Which looks "fuller" to you?
ATI Coral Plus (This is just for example, as I have always considered this a stand-alone bulb that could grow coral)
Ecotech Radion G4
AI Hydra
As you'll see, there are parts in the middle of the spectrum for the t5 that are completely missing. As far as chlorophyll is concerned, those are useless (just like green), but that still doesn't make t5s a "fuller light source". I dunno. Just a shower thought that I had.
ATI Coral Plus (This is just for example, as I have always considered this a stand-alone bulb that could grow coral)
Ecotech Radion G4
AI Hydra
As you'll see, there are parts in the middle of the spectrum for the t5 that are completely missing. As far as chlorophyll is concerned, those are useless (just like green), but that still doesn't make t5s a "fuller light source". I dunno. Just a shower thought that I had.