• Welcome back Guest!

    MARSH is a private reefing group. Comments and suggestions are encouraged, but please keep them positive and constructive. Negative threads, posts, or attacks will be removed from view and reviewed by the staff. Continually disruptive, argumentative, or flagrant rule breakers may be suspended or banned.

Why? (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

r_jay

Guest
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Location
288 South and Beltway 8
As I was staring into my pico today I thought to myself, "why bother with sand in a pico?"

Don't get me wrong, I have sand in my pico, and my biocube and before I took it down; my 65g. I just thought that a BB pico would be easier to take care of, i.e. clean increase water volume etc.

I know there are benefits to having a DSB but I don't want a pico filled with sand halfway up it, and I know that a less than 1" sandbed isn't bad. I just was thinking that it may be more stable if i take out the nitrate factory... but I mainly have softies in the pico so I imagine they like a little, "flavor" they get from the sandbed...

So I was wanting to ask if anyone else has an opinion on the matter. :?
 

steveb

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Board Member
Build Thread Contributor
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
11,953
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Spring
I don't have a pico but I do have a nano (36g) and am about at the same point. I'm about ready to suck the 3" (sugar grain sized) sand bed out. In my case its more than just nitrates. Its also the clown fish that thinks it needs to constantly re-aquascape my tank, burying corals and kicking up sand to act as an abrading material for the rest.
 

fishrme

Guest
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
Location
southeast, texas
i like the sand in the tank ...i have argonite sand in mine ...to me it just gives it the natural look ...i have a 8 gal biocube and a 29 gal biocube ...i have the snails that turn up the sand bed ...and i just stir it up with a turkey baster too once a week and keep it stirred up and i really dont have a problem with it
 

steveb

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Board Member
Build Thread Contributor
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
11,953
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Spring
I used CaribSea Aragamax Sugar-Sized and I love the look, and I do think if enough is present it adds a measure of buffering capacity. But I am not in love with the nitrate factory effect (I do clean mine, probably not as oft as I should..) or the sand blasting (dang maroon clown needs to go ;-) ). I have nassarius snails and few micro brittle starts.
 
OP
OP
r_jay

r_jay

Guest
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Location
288 South and Beltway 8
Yeah I think the only benefit to having sand is the appearance. Everyone likes the look of an aquarium with nice white sand. I also have nassarius snails, brittle stars and a snowflake eel (in my bigger tank) to stir up the sand, but it's never enough.

I definitely want to at least try BB in the future and see what difference there is in everything.
 

gabe_j

Guest
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
1,389
Reaction score
0
Location
clear lake
i'm on a bb tank and waiting for my gsp and zoas to take over the floor of the tank... ugh i hate waiting. i'm gonna go get some coffee mabe it'll feel like time is going faster.

but i'm considering adding a sand bed so yeah i guess its always greener..
 
OP
OP
r_jay

r_jay

Guest
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Location
288 South and Beltway 8
That would be cool...by then i bet the entire tank would just be GSP though, although steve's idea of turbos grazing in a field of gsp does sound awesome. I didn't realize how much turbos resemble cows until now.

I think I may just start to slowly siphon out more and more sand until its all gone.
 

rxonco

Guest
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
1,892
Reaction score
0
Location
Katy
Unless you're gonna run a DSB, you're only going for looks. With that said, I think BB tanks look like ***t. 8)
 
OP
OP
r_jay

r_jay

Guest
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Location
288 South and Beltway 8
rxonco said:
Unless you're gonna run a DSB, you're only going for looks. With that said, I think BB tanks look like ***t. 8)

True about BB looking bad but in the long run i think the tank would be better off for a pico.
 

steveb

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Board Member
Build Thread Contributor
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
11,953
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Spring
r_jay said:
That would be cool...by then i bet the entire tank would just be GSP though, although steve's idea of turbos grazing in a field of gsp does sound awesome. I didn't realize how much turbos resemble cows until now.

I think I may just start to slowly siphon out more and more sand until its all gone.

white plastic tooth pick and some super glue.......


On a more serious note I'm going to try this on the back wall of my 36 gallon

Blue Sympodium
blue%20sympodium%202%20%20(800x754)%20(2).jpg
 

rxonco

Guest
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
1,892
Reaction score
0
Location
Katy
1" sandbed is going to neither be a NO2 factory, nor a benefit to your tank...other than asthetics. By saying that it would be a nitrate factory would mean that it's converting just as much nitrite, and in turn, doing the job a DSB should do. It's just not gonna do that though. I would assume that with a "pico" tank, you're going to be doing weekly (at least) water changes. This along with a limited amount of livestock which can be placed in the tank, "should" keep the nitrates down to a minimum anyway. So, you're back to a simple asthetic issue. Which "looks" more like a little tiny reef. One that's bare bottomed and covered in coraline and detritus, or one covered in an inch or two of sand? :wink:
 
OP
OP
r_jay

r_jay

Guest
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Location
288 South and Beltway 8
Well obviously if my sandbed really were a "nitrate factory" I would have bigger problems right now. What I meant is that with 1" sandbed the detritus is only accumulating in the sandbed, where in a DSB alot more happens.

My concern is just that in picos [with such low water volume] one could improve water quality by having a bare bottom allowing you to siphon out the detritus on the bottom of the tank. I mean I've tried siphoning/"vacuuming" the sand bed in the pico and we all know how that works out, PITA and it just makes a bigger mess.

I do small water changes a couple times a week with NSW (from the box;-)) and I think the tank would benefit from a bare bottom. That being said I still have sand in there today. No plans as of yet to remove it.
 

steveb

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Board Member
Build Thread Contributor
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
11,953
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Spring
rxonco said:
1" sandbed is going to neither be a NO2 factory, nor a benefit to your tank...other than asthetics. By saying that it would be a nitrate factory would mean that it's converting just as much nitrite, and in turn, doing the job a DSB should do. It's just not gonna do that though. I would assume that with a "pico" tank, you're going to be doing weekly (at least) water changes. This along with a limited amount of livestock which can be placed in the tank, "should" keep the nitrates down to a minimum anyway. So, you're back to a simple asthetic issue. Which "looks" more like a little tiny reef. One that's bare bottomed and covered in coraline and detritus, or one covered in an inch or two of sand? :wink:

The term nitrate factory is used to mean that the sand bed is not breaking down nitrates. D.O.'s (dissolved organics) are taken into the sand bed through advection. The bed is not deep enough to harbor the necessary anerobic bacteria to process the D.O.'s to completion, breaking down nitrates. Rather the bed remains aerobic and produces nitrate from the D.O.'s being drawn into it (a nitrate factory).
 
Top